Humanverse

Linda vs Linnie

American parents have registered 1,458,899 Lindas since 1880, against 8,709 Linnies. Linda is still ahead, with 294 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Linda against Linnie, 1880 to 2025 0 25k 50k 75k 100k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Linda Linnie

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Linda for 128 years and Linnie for 18 years. The lead changed hands 11 times.

Side by side

  Linda Linnie
Total US births 1,458,8998,709
Most in one year 99,908191
Babies in 2025 29414
Estimated living today 1.1 million1,900
Median age today 7271
Peak year 19471921
Best rank 1st girls528th girls
Rank in 2025 902nd7,491st
First recorded 18801880
Girls / boys 1,455,143 / 3,7567,997 / 712

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Linda Linnie
England and Wales 7753

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Linda and Linnie.