Liviana vs Livingston
American parents have registered 1,071 Livingstons since 1880, against 605 Livianas. But in 2025 it was Liviana that was commoner, 27 babies to 12.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Liviana Livingston
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 101 years in which either name was published, Livingston for 82 years and Liviana for 19 years. The lead changed hands once.
- 1890–2006 Livingston ahead
- 2007–2025 Liviana ahead
Side by side
| Liviana | Livingston | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 605 | 1,071 |
| Most in one year | 49 | 29 |
| Babies in 2025 | 27 | 12 |
| Estimated living today | 600 | 580 |
| Median age today | 8 | 30 |
| Peak year | 2019 | 1917 |
| Best rank | 3,222nd girls | 1,264th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 4,878th | 12,008th |
| First recorded | 2007 | 1890 |
| Girls / boys | 605 / 0 | 114 / 957 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Livingstons alive today are over 30; half the Livianas are over 8. That is 22 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Liviana and Livingston.