Humanverse

Lon vs Lonzo

American parents have registered 9,856 Lons since 1880, against 3,961 Lonzos. But in 2025 it was Lonzo that was commoner, 25 babies to fewer than five.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Lon against Lonzo, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Lon Lonzo

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 145 years in which either name was published, Lon for 108 years and Lonzo for 37 years. The lead changed hands 25 times.

18 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Lon Lonzo
Total US births 9,8563,961
Most in one year 27485
Babies in 2025 under 525
Estimated living today 5,3001,500
Median age today 6457
Peak year 19481919
Best rank 411th boys673rd boys
Rank in 2025 unranked4,139th
First recorded 18801880
Girls / boys 20 / 9,8360 / 3,961

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lons alive today are over 64; half the Lonzos are over 57. That is 7 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lon and Lonzo.