Loretta vs Lorrayne
American parents have registered 178,066 Lorettas since 1880, against 827 Lorraynes. Loretta is still ahead, with 485 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Loretta Lorrayne
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Loretta has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 2009, when Loretta had 84 and Lorrayne had 7.
Side by side
| Loretta | Lorrayne | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 178,066 | 827 |
| Most in one year | 3,931 | 57 |
| Babies in 2025 | 485 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 88,000 | 180 |
| Median age today | 68 | 70 |
| Peak year | 1938 | 1924 |
| Best rank | 62nd girls | 1,017th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 606th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1913 |
| Girls / boys | 177,564 / 502 | 827 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Lorraynes alive today are over 70; half the Lorettas are over 68. That is 2 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
- Loretta West Virginia (2.4×), North Dakota (1.9×), New Mexico (1.8×)
- Lorrayne Minnesota (27.5×), Wisconsin (9.2×), Illinois (4.4×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Loretta and Lorrayne.