Humanverse

Luretha vs Luretta

American parents have registered 502 Lurethas since 1880, against 341 Lurettas. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Luretha against Luretta, 1880 to 2025 0 4 8 12 16 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Luretha Luretta

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 63 years in which either name was published, Luretha for 43 years and Luretta for 20 years. The lead changed hands 17 times.

13 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Luretha Luretta
Total US births 502341
Most in one year 1615
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 22090
Median age today 7278
Peak year 19511923
Best rank 2,577th girls2,366th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19121904
Girls / boys 502 / 0341 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Lurettas alive today are over 78; half the Lurethas are over 72. That is 6 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Luretha and Luretta.