Macarther vs Mackenzie
American parents have registered 149,135 Mackenzies since 1880, against 10 Macarthers. Mackenzie is still ahead, with 1,442 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Macarther Mackenzie
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 54 years in which either name was published, Mackenzie for 53 years and Macarther for 1 year. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Macarther | Mackenzie | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 10 | 149,135 |
| Most in one year | 10 | 7,105 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 1,442 |
| Estimated living today | 4 | 147,000 |
| Median age today | 83 | 21 |
| Peak year | 1942 | 2001 |
| Best rank | 2,386th boys | 40th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 228th |
| First recorded | 1942 | 1973 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 10 | 141,274 / 7,861 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Macarthers alive today are over 83; half the Mackenzies are over 21. That is 62 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Macarther and Mackenzie.