Nara vs Narek
American parents have registered 1,069 Naras since 1880, against 675 Nareks. Nara is still ahead, with 72 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Nara Narek
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 64 years in which either name was published, Nara for 49 years and Narek for 15 years. The lead changed hands 10 times.
Side by side
| Nara | Narek | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,069 | 675 |
| Most in one year | 72 | 42 |
| Babies in 2025 | 72 | 30 |
| Estimated living today | 1,000 | 670 |
| Median age today | 10 | 11 |
| Peak year | 2024 | 2021 |
| Best rank | 2,491st girls | 2,918th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 2,458th | 3,658th |
| First recorded | 1909 | 1990 |
| Girls / boys | 1,052 / 17 | 0 / 675 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Where each one is strongest
- Nara California (7.0×), New York (1.7×)
- Narek California (9.9×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Both names abroad
Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.
Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Nara and Narek.