Humanverse

Oakleigh vs Oaklyn

American parents have registered 5,400 Oaklyns since 1880, against 4,138 Oakleighs. Oaklyn is still ahead, with 479 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Oakleigh against Oaklyn, 1880 to 2025 0 200 400 600 800 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Oakleigh Oaklyn

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 21 years in which either name was published, Oakleigh for 12 years and Oaklyn for 9 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

Side by side

  Oakleigh Oaklyn
Total US births 4,1385,400
Most in one year 603682
Babies in 2025 423479
Estimated living today 4,1005,400
Median age today 34
Peak year 20232018
Best rank 507th girls494th girls
Rank in 2025 666th637th
First recorded 20052006
Girls / boys 4,121 / 175,027 / 373

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Oakleigh Oaklyn
England and Wales 32793

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Oakleigh and Oaklyn.