Oneida vs Oneita
American parents have registered 2,268 Oneidas since 1880, against 869 Oneitas. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Oneida Oneita
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 125 years in which either name was published, Oneida for 110 years and Oneita for 15 years. The lead changed hands 14 times.
- 1887–1894 Oneida ahead
- 1895–1898 Oneita ahead
- 1899–1901 Oneida ahead
- 1908–1912 Oneita ahead
- 1913–2023 Oneida ahead, apart from 3 short spells
7 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Oneida | Oneita | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 2,268 | 869 |
| Most in one year | 63 | 33 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 1,100 | 150 |
| Median age today | 52 | 78 |
| Peak year | 1919 | 1921 |
| Best rank | 882nd girls | 1,409th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1887 | 1895 |
| Girls / boys | 2,268 / 0 | 869 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Oneitas alive today are over 78; half the Oneidas are over 52. That is 26 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Where each one is strongest
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Oneida and Oneita.