Parklynn vs Parrish
American parents have registered 3,190 Parrishes since 1880, against 201 Parklynns. But in 2025 it was Parklynn that was commoner, 16 babies to 15.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Parklynn Parrish
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 67 years in which either name was published, Parrish for 62 years and Parklynn for 5 years. The lead changed hands once.
Side by side
| Parklynn | Parrish | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 201 | 3,190 |
| Most in one year | 88 | 134 |
| Babies in 2025 | 16 | 15 |
| Estimated living today | 200 | 2,900 |
| Median age today | 3 | 38 |
| Peak year | 2022 | 1966 |
| Best rank | 2,156th girls | 663rd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 6,838th | 8,243rd |
| First recorded | 2021 | 1943 |
| Girls / boys | 201 / 0 | 484 / 2,706 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Parrishes alive today are over 38; half the Parklynns are over 3. That is 35 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Parklynn and Parrish.