Rema vs Remmington
American parents have registered 1,217 Remas since 1880, against 705 Remmingtons. But in 2025 it was Remmington that was commoner, 28 babies to 7.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Rema Remmington
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 112 years in which either name was published, Rema for 92 years and Remmington for 20 years. The lead changed hands once.
- 1907–2005 Rema ahead
- 2006–2025 Remmington ahead
Side by side
| Rema | Remmington | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,217 | 705 |
| Most in one year | 28 | 54 |
| Babies in 2025 | 7 | 28 |
| Estimated living today | 750 | 700 |
| Median age today | 40 | 8 |
| Peak year | 1918 | 2020 |
| Best rank | 1,497th girls | 3,418th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 11,932nd | 5,608th |
| First recorded | 1907 | 1984 |
| Girls / boys | 1,207 / 10 | 278 / 427 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Remas alive today are over 40; half the Remmingtons are over 8. That is 32 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Rema and Remmington.