Humanverse

Rema vs Remonia

American parents have registered 1,217 Remas since 1880, against 426 Remonias. Rema is still ahead, with 7 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Rema against Remonia, 1880 to 2025 0 8 16 24 32 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Rema Remonia

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 114 years in which either name was published, Rema for 95 years and Remonia for 19 years. The lead changed hands 14 times.

8 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Rema Remonia
Total US births 1,217426
Most in one year 2823
Babies in 2025 7under 5
Estimated living today 750280
Median age today 4068
Peak year 19181957
Best rank 1,497th girls2,347th girls
Rank in 2025 11,932ndunranked
First recorded 19071928
Girls / boys 1,207 / 10426 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Remonias alive today are over 68; half the Remas are over 40. That is 28 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Rema and Remonia.