Humanverse

Ringo vs Rinoa

American parents have registered 560 Rinoas since 1880, against 253 Ringos. Rinoa is still ahead, with 26 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Ringo against Rinoa, 1880 to 2025 0 13 25 38 50 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Ringo Rinoa

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 43 years in which either name was published, Rinoa for 26 years and Ringo for 17 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Ringo Rinoa
Total US births 253560
Most in one year 1843
Babies in 2025 826
Estimated living today 240560
Median age today 399
Peak year 19652017
Best rank 1,856th boys3,552nd girls
Rank in 2025 8,910th4,987th
First recorded 19642000
Girls / boys 0 / 253560 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Ringos alive today are over 39; half the Rinoas are over 9. That is 30 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Ringo Rinoa
England and Wales 352

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ringo and Rinoa.