Humanverse

Roe vs Roel

American parents have registered 4,711 Roels since 1880, against 1,119 Roes. Roel is still ahead, with 54 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Roe against Roel, 1880 to 2025 0 25 50 75 100 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Roe Roel

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 134 years in which either name was published, Roel for 85 years and Roe for 49 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

Side by side

  Roe Roel
Total US births 1,1194,711
Most in one year 3283
Babies in 2025 2154
Estimated living today 4404,200
Median age today 4836
Peak year 19162000
Best rank 1,374th boys1,479th boys
Rank in 2025 8,910th2,480th
First recorded 18811926
Girls / boys 210 / 9090 / 4,711

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Roes alive today are over 48; half the Roels are over 36. That is 12 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Roe Roel
England and Wales 51137

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Roe and Roel.