Rollin vs Rollins
American parents have registered 5,771 Rollins since 1880, against 636 Rollinses. But in 2025 it was Rollins that was commoner, 59 babies to 13.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Rollin Rollins
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 145 years in which either name was published, Rollin for 135 years and Rollins for 10 years. The lead changed hands 7 times.
Side by side
| Rollin | Rollins | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 5,771 | 636 |
| Most in one year | 137 | 59 |
| Babies in 2025 | 13 | 59 |
| Estimated living today | 2,200 | 500 |
| Median age today | 59 | 5 |
| Peak year | 1925 | 2025 |
| Best rank | 525th boys | 3,583rd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 6,446th | 3,583rd |
| First recorded | 1880 | 1908 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 5,771 | 154 / 482 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Rollins alive today are over 59; half the Rollinses are over 5. That is 54 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Rollin and Rollins.