Humanverse

Ryne vs Rynlee

American parents have registered 4,404 Rynes since 1880, against 924 Rynlees. But in 2025 it was Rynlee that was commoner, 359 babies to 18.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Ryne against Rynlee, 1880 to 2025 0 100 200 300 400 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Ryne Rynlee

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 52 years in which either name was published, Ryne for 44 years and Rynlee for 8 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Ryne Rynlee
Total US births 4,404924
Most in one year 286359
Babies in 2025 18359
Estimated living today 4,200920
Median age today 322
Peak year 19852025
Best rank 516th boys755th girls
Rank in 2025 5,208th755th
First recorded 19582014
Girls / boys 31 / 4,373924 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Rynes alive today are over 32; half the Rynlees are over 2. That is 30 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Ryne and Rynlee.