Humanverse

Shirlene vs Shirrell

American parents have registered 4,856 Shirlenes since 1880, against 99 Shirrells. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Shirlene against Shirrell, 1880 to 2025 0 40 80 120 160 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Shirlene Shirrell

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Shirlene has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1923 to 2010. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 1987, when Shirlene had 13 and Shirrell had 7.

Side by side

  Shirlene Shirrell
Total US births 4,85699
Most in one year 1599
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 3,40070
Median age today 6859
Peak year 19561966
Best rank 782nd girls4,493rd girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19231931
Girls / boys 4,856 / 068 / 31

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Shirlenes alive today are over 68; half the Shirrells are over 59. That is 9 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Shirlene and Shirrell.