Humanverse

Stanford vs Starr

American parents have registered 10,167 Starrs since 1880, against 7,727 Stanfords. Starr is still ahead, with 63 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Stanford against Starr, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Stanford Starr

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 131 years in which either name was published, Stanford for 67 years and Starr for 64 years. The lead changed hands 13 times.

9 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Stanford Starr
Total US births 7,72710,167
Most in one year 135307
Babies in 2025 1263
Estimated living today 3,9009,200
Median age today 5936
Peak year 19541997
Best rank 633rd boys714th girls
Rank in 2025 6,803rd2,719th
First recorded 18801914
Girls / boys 0 / 7,7279,843 / 324

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Stanfords alive today are over 59; half the Starrs are over 36. That is 23 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Stanford and Starr.