Humanverse

Taliyah vs Talon

American parents have registered 13,039 Talons since 1880, against 8,900 Taliyahs. But in 2025 it was Taliyah that was commoner, 203 babies to 182.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Taliyah against Talon, 1880 to 2025 0 200 400 600 800 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Taliyah Talon

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 51 years in which either name was published, Talon for 47 years and Taliyah for 4 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

Side by side

  Taliyah Talon
Total US births 8,90013,039
Most in one year 458679
Babies in 2025 203182
Estimated living today 8,80013,000
Median age today 1516
Peak year 20082006
Best rank 670th girls426th boys
Rank in 2025 1,139th1,176th
First recorded 19941975
Girls / boys 8,900 / 0542 / 12,497

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Taliyah Talon
England and Wales 612102

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Taliyah and Talon.