Humanverse

Tru vs True

American parents have registered 6,324 Trus since 1880, against 4,665 Trues. Tru is still ahead, with 758 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Tru against True, 1880 to 2025 0 200 400 600 800 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Tru True

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 77 years in which either name was published, True for 55 years and Tru for 22 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Tru True
Total US births 6,3244,665
Most in one year 767437
Babies in 2025 758369
Estimated living today 6,3004,400
Median age today 45
Peak year 20252024
Best rank 591st boys980th boys
Rank in 2025 591st1,046th
First recorded 19951882
Girls / boys 2,530 / 3,7942,186 / 2,479

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Country Tru True
England and Wales 8741

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Tru and True.