Humanverse

Vander vs Vannessa

American parents have registered 3,231 Vannessas since 1880, against 1,828 Vanders. But in 2025 it was Vander that was commoner, 139 babies to fewer than five.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Vander against Vannessa, 1880 to 2025 0 40 80 120 160 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Vander Vannessa

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 118 years in which either name was published, Vander for 61 years and Vannessa for 57 years. The lead changed hands 2 times.

Side by side

  Vander Vannessa
Total US births 1,8283,231
Most in one year 139123
Babies in 2025 139under 5
Estimated living today 1,5003,100
Median age today 937
Peak year 20251987
Best rank 1,352nd boys1,182nd girls
Rank in 2025 1,352ndunranked
First recorded 18841951
Girls / boys 0 / 1,8283,231 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Vannessas alive today are over 37; half the Vanders are over 9. That is 28 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Vander and Vannessa.