Humanverse

Velma vs Velvet

American parents have registered 87,202 Velmas since 1880, against 3,101 Velvets. Velma is still ahead, with 21 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Velma against Velvet, 1880 to 2025 0 800 1.6k 2.4k 3.2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Velma Velvet

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Velma for 128 years and Velvet for 18 years. The lead changed hands 18 times.

12 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.

Side by side

  Velma Velvet
Total US births 87,2023,101
Most in one year 2,613332
Babies in 2025 2112
Estimated living today 20,0002,800
Median age today 7454
Peak year 19211961
Best rank 108th girls541st girls
Rank in 2025 5,722nd8,362nd
First recorded 18801920
Girls / boys 86,752 / 4503,096 / 5

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Velmas alive today are over 74; half the Velvets are over 54. That is 20 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Velma and Velvet.