Humanverse

Vern vs Verona

American parents have registered 11,982 Verns since 1880, against 4,314 Veronas. But in 2025 it was Verona that was commoner, 25 babies to 7.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Vern against Verona, 1880 to 2025 0 80 160 240 320 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Vern Verona

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Vern for 118 years and Verona for 28 years. The lead changed hands 7 times.

Side by side

  Vern Verona
Total US births 11,9824,314
Most in one year 282111
Babies in 2025 725
Estimated living today 3,7001,400
Median age today 6859
Peak year 19201920
Best rank 359th boys690th girls
Rank in 2025 9,714th5,099th
First recorded 18801880
Girls / boys 485 / 11,4974,314 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Verns alive today are over 68; half the Veronas are over 59. That is 9 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Vern and Verona.