Humanverse

Vernell vs Vernie

American parents have registered 10,468 Vernells since 1880, against 6,719 Vernies. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Vernell against Vernie, 1880 to 2025 0 60 120 180 240 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Vernell Vernie

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 139 years in which either name was published, Vernell for 96 years and Vernie for 43 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Vernell Vernie
Total US births 10,4686,719
Most in one year 215191
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 5,1001,300
Median age today 6874
Peak year 19241916
Best rank 543rd girls606th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 18971880
Girls / boys 7,124 / 3,3443,959 / 2,760

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Vernies alive today are over 74; half the Vernells are over 68. That is 6 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Vernell and Vernie.