Von vs Vonna
American parents have registered 6,011 Vons since 1880, against 1,095 Vonnas. Von is still ahead, with 68 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Von Vonna
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Von has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1898 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1944, when Von had 38 and Vonna had 26.
Side by side
| Von | Vonna | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 6,011 | 1,095 |
| Most in one year | 135 | 36 |
| Babies in 2025 | 68 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 4,200 | 620 |
| Median age today | 50 | 70 |
| Peak year | 1958 | 1960 |
| Best rank | 691st boys | 1,887th girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 2,125th | unranked |
| First recorded | 1898 | 1915 |
| Girls / boys | 459 / 5,552 | 1,095 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Vonnas alive today are over 70; half the Vons are over 50. That is 20 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Von and Vonna.