Ward vs Warner

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Ward Warner

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Ward for 109 years and Warner for 37 years. The lead changed hands 9 times.

• 1880–1934 Ward ahead
• 1935–1937 Warner ahead
• 1938–1980 Ward ahead
• 1981 Warner ahead
• 1982–1987 Ward ahead
• 1988 Warner ahead
• 1989–1991 Ward ahead
• 1992–1996 Warner ahead
• 1997–1998 Ward ahead
• 1999–2025 Warner ahead

Side by side

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Wards alive today are over 63; half the Warners are over 30. That is 33 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

• Ward Iowa (2.8×), Michigan (2.6×), Minnesota (2.5×)
• Warner Virginia (4.2×), Tennessee (2.8×), Georgia (2.2×)

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

• Ward vs Warren
• Ward vs Wardell
• Ward vs Warrick
• Warner vs Warren
• Warner vs Wardell
• Warner vs Warrick