Wardell vs Warnie
American parents have registered 4,326 Wardells since 1880, against 141 Warnies. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Wardell Warnie
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Wardell has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1896 to 2020. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1916, when Wardell had 40 and Warnie had 12.
Side by side
| Wardell | Warnie | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 4,326 | 141 |
| Most in one year | 87 | 12 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 2,200 | 20 |
| Median age today | 62 | 81 |
| Peak year | 1950 | 1916 |
| Best rank | 736th boys | 2,259th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1896 | 1916 |
| Girls / boys | 36 / 4,290 | 0 / 141 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Warnies alive today are over 81; half the Wardells are over 62. That is 19 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Wardell and Warnie.