Whit vs Whitman
American parents have registered 1,287 Whits since 1880, against 901 Whitmans. Whit is still ahead, with 79 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Whit Whitman
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 121 years in which either name was published, Whit for 85 years and Whitman for 36 years. The lead changed hands 18 times.
- 1881–1986 Whit ahead, apart from 5 short spells
- 1989–2018 Whitman ahead, apart from one short spell
- 2019–2025 Whit ahead
10 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Whit | Whitman | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 1,287 | 901 |
| Most in one year | 79 | 39 |
| Babies in 2025 | 79 | 33 |
| Estimated living today | 890 | 770 |
| Median age today | 9 | 12 |
| Peak year | 2025 | 2018 |
| Best rank | 1,942nd boys | 2,994th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | 1,942nd | 3,450th |
| First recorded | 1881 | 1909 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 1,287 | 0 / 901 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Whitmans alive today are over 12; half the Whits are over 9. That is 3 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Whit and Whitman.