Baby names of 2009
Isabella and Jacob topped the lists in 2009, out of 3,820,687 births recorded across 32,278 different names. That is 2.8% fewer than the 2008 files hold. About 3.8 million of them are alive today.
Girls
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Isabella | 22,321 |
| 2 | Emma | 17,910 |
| 3 | Olivia | 17,444 |
| 4 | Sophia | 16,951 |
| 5 | Ava | 15,877 |
| 6 | Emily | 15,366 |
| 7 | Madison | 15,257 |
| 8 | Abigail | 14,401 |
| 9 | Chloe | 11,922 |
| 10 | Mia | 11,438 |
| 11 | Elizabeth | 11,057 |
| 12 | Addison | 10,669 |
| 13 | Alexis | 9,946 |
| 14 | Samantha | 9,669 |
| 15 | Ella | 9,659 |
| 16 | Natalie | 9,421 |
| 17 | Grace | 8,322 |
| 18 | Lily | 8,101 |
| 19 | Alyssa | 7,980 |
| 20 | Ashley | 7,815 |
| 21 | Sarah | 7,794 |
| 22 | Taylor | 7,590 |
| 23 | Hannah | 7,584 |
| 24 | Brianna | 7,357 |
| 25 | Hailey | 7,325 |
All 200 girls’ names of 2009 (20,199 recorded)
Boys
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jacob | 21,204 |
| 2 | Ethan | 19,858 |
| 3 | Michael | 18,964 |
| 4 | Alexander | 18,254 |
| 5 | William | 17,937 |
| 6 | Joshua | 17,671 |
| 7 | Daniel | 17,564 |
| 8 | Jayden | 17,316 |
| 9 | Noah | 17,262 |
| 10 | Christopher | 16,368 |
| 11 | Anthony | 16,327 |
| 12 | Aiden | 16,030 |
| 13 | Matthew | 16,010 |
| 14 | David | 15,457 |
| 15 | Joseph | 14,952 |
| 16 | Andrew | 14,877 |
| 17 | Logan | 14,467 |
| 18 | James | 14,223 |
| 19 | Benjamin | 13,123 |
| 20 | Ryan | 13,122 |
| 21 | Elijah | 12,846 |
| 22 | Gabriel | 12,834 |
| 23 | Christian | 12,657 |
| 24 | Samuel | 12,181 |
| 25 | Nathan | 12,135 |
All 200 boys’ names of 2009 (14,540 recorded)
Biggest climbers, girls
Names that gained the most ground on 2008:
Biggest climbers, boys
Names that gained the most ground on 2008:
First recorded in 2009, girls
Names the SSA had never published before 2009:
First recorded in 2009, boys
Names the SSA had never published before 2009:
Try it on yourself
Source: US Social Security Administration national baby-name files. Names given to fewer than five babies in a year are not published, so the totals here run below the true number of births. How far below is not the same in every year: the files hold 201,484 births for 1880 and 3,315,343 for 2025, so a change from one year to the next in the early decades is partly a change in what the record covers.