Almedia vs Almon
American parents have registered 1,628 Almons since 1880, against 530 Almedias. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Almedia Almon
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 111 years in which either name was published, Almon for 100 years and Almedia for 11 years. The lead changed hands 14 times.
- 1880–2006 Almon ahead, apart from 5 short spells
9 shorter spells of a year or two are folded into the spans above rather than listed separately.
Side by side
| Almedia | Almon | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 530 | 1,628 |
| Most in one year | 19 | 59 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 110 | 380 |
| Median age today | 78 | 65 |
| Peak year | 1922 | 1918 |
| Best rank | 2,027th girls | 855th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1881 | 1880 |
| Girls / boys | 530 / 0 | 18 / 1,610 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Almedias alive today are over 78; half the Almons are over 65. That is 13 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Almedia and Almon.