Cregg vs Creighton
American parents have registered 3,780 Creightons since 1880, against 179 Creggs. Creighton is still ahead, with 29 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Cregg Creighton
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Creighton has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1906 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.
The closest they came was 1958, when Cregg had 12 and Creighton had 22.
Side by side
| Cregg | Creighton | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 179 | 3,780 |
| Most in one year | 12 | 81 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 29 |
| Estimated living today | 140 | 2,900 |
| Median age today | 59 | 28 |
| Peak year | 1958 | 2007 |
| Best rank | 2,370th boys | 1,795th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 3,757th |
| First recorded | 1951 | 1906 |
| Girls / boys | 0 / 179 | 16 / 3,764 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Creggs alive today are over 59; half the Creightons are over 28. That is 31 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Cregg and Creighton.