Humanverse

Cregg vs Creola

American parents have registered 1,742 Creolas since 1880, against 179 Creggs. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Cregg against Creola, 1880 to 2025 0 20 40 60 80 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Cregg Creola

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 85 years in which either name was published, Creola for 71 years and Cregg for 14 years. The lead changed hands 11 times.

Side by side

  Cregg Creola
Total US births 1791,742
Most in one year 1267
Babies in 2025 under 5under 5
Estimated living today 140390
Median age today 5976
Peak year 19581920
Best rank 2,370th boys885th girls
Rank in 2025 unrankedunranked
First recorded 19511880
Girls / boys 0 / 1791,742 / 0

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Creolas alive today are over 76; half the Creggs are over 59. That is 17 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Cregg and Creola.