Gilda vs Gilmer
American parents have registered 10,078 Gildas since 1880, against 1,187 Gilmers. Neither name reached five babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Gilda Gilmer
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 121 years in which either name was published, Gilda for 117 years and Gilmer for 4 years. The lead changed hands 8 times.
Side by side
| Gilda | Gilmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 10,078 | 1,187 |
| Most in one year | 346 | 44 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | under 5 |
| Estimated living today | 4,900 | 330 |
| Median age today | 69 | 68 |
| Peak year | 1947 | 1918 |
| Best rank | 441st girls | 1,012th boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | unranked |
| First recorded | 1898 | 1907 |
| Girls / boys | 10,078 / 0 | 0 / 1,187 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Where each one is strongest
- Gilda Rhode Island (6.1×), Louisiana (3.6×), New York (3.5×)
- Gilmer North Carolina (22.2×), Virginia (12.6×)
How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Gilda and Gilmer.