Hazelgrace vs Hazelle
American parents have registered 932 Hazelles since 1880, against 171 Hazelgraces. Hazelle is still ahead, with 20 babies in 2025.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Hazelgrace Hazelle
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 64 years in which either name was published, Hazelle for 61 years and Hazelgrace for 3 years. The lead changed hands 2 times.
- 1888–2016 Hazelle ahead
- 2017–2019 Hazelgrace ahead
- 2020–2025 Hazelle ahead
Side by side
| Hazelgrace | Hazelle | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 171 | 932 |
| Most in one year | 23 | 34 |
| Babies in 2025 | 12 | 20 |
| Estimated living today | 170 | 390 |
| Median age today | 6 | 10 |
| Peak year | 2017 | 1914 |
| Best rank | 5,517th girls | 1,023rd girls |
| Rank in 2025 | 8,362nd | 5,917th |
| First recorded | 2015 | 1888 |
| Girls / boys | 171 / 0 | 932 / 0 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Hazelles alive today are over 10; half the Hazelgraces are over 6. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Hazelgrace and Hazelle.