Lawana vs Lawayne
American parents have registered 3,029 Lawanas since 1880, against 579 Lawaynes. But in 2025 it was Lawayne that was commoner, 9 babies to fewer than five.
Babies given each name, 1880–2025
Lawana Lawayne
Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.
Who was ahead
Of the 105 years in which either name was published, Lawana for 74 years and Lawayne for 31 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.
Side by side
| Lawana | Lawayne | |
|---|---|---|
| Total US births | 3,029 | 579 |
| Most in one year | 87 | 15 |
| Babies in 2025 | under 5 | 9 |
| Estimated living today | 2,200 | 480 |
| Median age today | 62 | 35 |
| Peak year | 1971 | 1940 |
| Best rank | 1,266th girls | 1,802nd boys |
| Rank in 2025 | unranked | 8,243rd |
| First recorded | 1918 | 1926 |
| Girls / boys | 3,029 / 0 | 10 / 569 |
A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.
Which name is older
Half of the Lawanas alive today are over 62; half the Lawaynes are over 35. That is 27 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.
Compare something else
Related comparisons
Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Lawana and Lawayne.