Parisa vs Parth

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Parisa Parth

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 53 years in which either name was published, Parth for 35 years and Parisa for 18 years. The lead changed hands 3 times.

• 1971–1989 Parisa ahead
• 1990–2016 Parth ahead
• 2017 Parisa ahead
• 2018–2025 Parth ahead

Side by side

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Where each one is strongest

• Parisa California (8.8×)
• Parth New Jersey (12.0×), Illinois (3.1×), California (2.6×)

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

• Parisa vs Parker
• Parisa vs Paris
• Parisa vs Parris
• Parisa vs Parrish
• Parisa vs Park
• Parth vs Parker
• Parth vs Paris
• Parth vs Parris