Rae vs Raekwon

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Rae Raekwon

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Rae for 137 years and Raekwon for 9 years. The lead changed hands 2 times.

• 1880–1994 Rae ahead
• 1995–2003 Raekwon ahead
• 2004–2025 Rae ahead

Side by side

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Raes alive today are over 57; half the Raekwons are over 27. That is 30 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

• Rae Utah (2.6×), Hawaii (2.0×), New York (1.9×)
• Raekwon South Carolina (6.8×), North Carolina (5.9×), Virginia (5.1×)

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

• Rae vs Raelynn
• Rae vs Raegan
• Rae vs Raelyn
• Rae vs Raeann
• Rae vs Raelene
• Rae vs Raeleigh
• Raekwon vs Raelynn
• Raekwon vs Raegan