Raekwon vs Raelynn

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Raekwon Raelynn

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 75 years in which either name was published, Raelynn for 69 years and Raekwon for 6 years. The lead changed hands 2 times.

• 1947–1994 Raelynn ahead
• 1995–2000 Raekwon ahead
• 2001–2025 Raelynn ahead

Side by side

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Raekwons alive today are over 27; half the Raelynns are over 6. That is 21 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

• Raekwon South Carolina (6.8×), North Carolina (5.9×), Virginia (5.1×)
• Raelynn Kentucky (1.9×), Idaho (1.7×), Tennessee (1.6×)

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Both names abroad

Countries whose statistics office publishes both names, so the comparison can be made somewhere other than the United States.

Every spelling a country files separately is added together, over whatever years that country publishes — which is not the same range in any two of them, so read the columns against each other and not the rows.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

• Raekwon vs Raegan
• Raekwon vs Rae
• Raekwon vs Raelyn
• Raekwon vs Raeann
• Raekwon vs Raelene
• Raelynn vs Raegan
• Raelynn vs Rae
• Raelynn vs Raelyn