Humanverse

Verna vs Vernice

American parents have registered 69,638 Vernas since 1880, against 8,079 Vernices. Verna is still ahead, with 44 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Verna against Vernice, 1880 to 2025 0 500 1k 1.5k 2k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Verna Vernice

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Verna has been the commoner name in every year either was published, 1880 to 2025. The lead has never changed hands.

The closest they came was 1992, when Verna had 30 and Vernice had 18.

Side by side

  Verna Vernice
Total US births 69,6388,079
Most in one year 1,885245
Babies in 2025 44under 5
Estimated living today 18,0002,700
Median age today 7268
Peak year 19181923
Best rank 125th girls458th girls
Rank in 2025 3,459thunranked
First recorded 18801887
Girls / boys 69,113 / 5257,290 / 789

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Vernas alive today are over 72; half the Vernices are over 68. That is 4 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Verna and Vernice.