Humanverse

Verna vs Veronica

American parents have registered 224,609 Veronicas since 1880, against 69,638 Vernas. Veronica is still ahead, with 730 babies in 2025.

Babies given each name, 1880–2025

Births per year: Verna against Veronica, 1880 to 2025 0 1.3k 2.5k 3.8k 5k 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Verna Veronica

Each line is every baby given the name that year, girls and boys added together — the only count that means the same thing for both names. A line breaks where the name fell below five babies in a year — the point at which the SSA stops publishing it — rather than being drawn through a figure nobody published. A single published year in a gap shows as a dot.

Who was ahead

Of the 146 years in which either name was published, Veronica for 84 years and Verna for 62 years. The lead changed hands once.

Side by side

  Verna Veronica
Total US births 69,638224,609
Most in one year 1,8854,407
Babies in 2025 44730
Estimated living today 18,000185,000
Median age today 7244
Peak year 19181980
Best rank 125th girls70th girls
Rank in 2025 3,459th427th
First recorded 18801880
Girls / boys 69,113 / 525223,775 / 834

A rank is a position within one sex’s list for one year, so the two rank rows are not subtracted from one another and the winning column is not marked on them. The living figure is a life-table estimate, not a count.

Which name is older

Half of the Vernas alive today are over 72; half the Veronicas are over 44. That is 28 years between them: two names in use at the same time, worn by two different generations.

Where each one is strongest

How much commoner the name is in that state than it is nationally, from births recorded since 1910.

Compare something else

Related comparisons

Social Security Administration birth records, 1880–2025, public domain. Full histories: Verna and Veronica.