Baby names of 1893
Mary and John topped the lists in 1893, out of 325,223 births recorded across 2,622 different names. That is 2.7% fewer than the 1892 files hold.
Girls
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mary | 12,784 |
| 2 | Anna | 5,695 |
| 3 | Ruth | 3,658 |
| 4 | Margaret | 3,565 |
| 5 | Elizabeth | 3,360 |
| 6 | Helen | 3,249 |
| 7 | Florence | 3,231 |
| 8 | Ethel | 3,119 |
| 9 | Emma | 2,968 |
| 10 | Bertha | 2,623 |
| 11 | Clara | 2,532 |
| 12 | Minnie | 2,510 |
| 13 | Alice | 2,434 |
| 14 | Edna | 2,378 |
| 15 | Bessie | 2,352 |
| 16 | Grace | 2,308 |
| 17 | Annie | 2,251 |
| 18 | Ida | 2,247 |
| 19 | Marie | 2,212 |
| 20 | Lillian | 2,193 |
| 21 | Mabel | 2,191 |
| 22 | Hazel | 2,052 |
| 23 | Rose | 2,012 |
| 24 | Gertrude | 1,811 |
| 25 | Martha | 1,805 |
All 200 girls’ names of 1893 (1,652 recorded)
Boys
| # | Name | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | John | 8,049 |
| 2 | William | 7,223 |
| 3 | James | 5,030 |
| 4 | George | 4,320 |
| 5 | Charles | 3,723 |
| 6 | Joseph | 2,997 |
| 7 | Frank | 2,917 |
| 8 | Robert | 2,563 |
| 9 | Edward | 2,309 |
| 10 | Harry | 2,245 |
| 11 | Henry | 2,162 |
| 12 | Thomas | 2,157 |
| 13 | Walter | 2,004 |
| 14 | Arthur | 1,635 |
| 15 | Fred | 1,493 |
| 16 | Albert | 1,353 |
| 17 | Clarence | 1,169 |
| 18 | Roy | 919 |
| 19 | Willie | 882 |
| 20 | Samuel | 851 |
| 21 | Earl | 819 |
| 22 | Louis | 816 |
| 23 | Ernest | 796 |
| 24 | Carl | 786 |
| 25 | Paul | 743 |
All 200 boys’ names of 1893 (1,179 recorded)
Biggest climbers, girls
Names that gained the most ground on 1892:
Biggest climbers, boys
Names that gained the most ground on 1892:
- Lindsay #1,066 → #391 +675
- Carrie #1,066 → #538 +528
- Jule #1,066 → #538 +528
- Ansel #1,066 → #538 +528
- Sanders #1,066 → #538 +528
- Elie #1,066 → #572 +494
- Cletus #1,066 → #572 +494
- Thad #1,066 → #572 +494
Lindsay, Carrie and Jule are here because the boys’ file records them: the SSA publishes every name given to five or more babies of one sex, and a rank is a position within that list. It is not a claim about whose name it is.
First recorded in 1893, girls
Names the SSA had never published before 1893:
Orba is here because the girls’ file records it: the SSA publishes every name given to five or more babies of one sex, and a rank is a position within that list. It is not a claim about whose name it is.
First recorded in 1893, boys
Names the SSA had never published before 1893:
Try it on yourself
Source: US Social Security Administration national baby-name files. Names given to fewer than five babies in a year are not published, so the totals here run below the true number of births. How far below is not the same in every year: the files hold 201,484 births for 1880 and 3,315,343 for 2025, so a change from one year to the next in the early decades is partly a change in what the record covers.